Comments on: Merger Announcement https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/ Making data management a revenue generator Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:42:40 +0000 hourly 1 By: Marisq Rondini https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1319 Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:49:47 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1319 It appears Affiniscape customers will be sunsetted onto the Your Membership platform. This is advantageous to Affinidcspe’s clients seeing how Your Memebrship is an infinitely better product. This also benefits Your Membership now they hsve one less competitor.

]]>
By: Larry Ward https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1318 Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:31:42 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1318 Tim, Your Membership is an infinitely better managed company. They were able to get rid of a competitor for cheap.

]]>
By: Wes Trochlil https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1317 Thu, 03 Jan 2013 03:16:46 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1317 In reply to Tim.

Good thoughts, Tim. I appreciate your perspective as someone on the “inside” of one of these deals.

]]>
By: Tim https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1316 Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:58:31 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1316 As a past employee at gomembers, I have some insight into acquisitions/mergers. During my time at gomembers, the company acquired several different AMS companies. While it looked good on paper and made for great conversation, our clients were hurt by these acquisitions. We ended up bleeding our client base because we could barely support one AMS solution let alone several different AMS solutions. I would add we had more than 200 employees and still couldn’t pull it off. The rest is history.

1. Will Yourmembership continue to support two different AMS solutions? The last time I checked both Affininscape and Yourmembership both served the small to midsized market.
2. If Yourmembership decides to phase out one solution, which solution goes away and what happens to the clients on that solution?
3. Will their clients be forced into an upgrade or lose support if they begin phasing out one product?

I think a merger with a company that compliments or fills a gap with the existing AMS product makes more sense (social media tool, CMS, LMS etc.).

]]>
By: Wes Trochlil https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1315 Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:22:07 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1315 In reply to Jeremy Barnes.

You named Oracle three times. The exception that proves the rule.

How about CDC Software, which spent the past three years acquiring countless software companies, including AMS companies, only to file for bankruptcy?

]]>
By: Jeremy Barnes https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1314 Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:09:52 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1314 I am sure Oracle/PeopleSoft. Oracle/Siebel. Oracle/BEA Systems are failures…

]]>
By: Wes Trochlil https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1313 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:47:35 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1313 In reply to Bill Murray.

I didn’t say I was against them, I said I’m skeptical of them, because they rarely work. The business world is riddled with software company merger failures.

]]>
By: Bill Murray https://effectivedatabase.com/merger-announcement/#comment-1312 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:41:00 +0000 http://effectivedatabase.com/?p=4126#comment-1312 What a surprise, Wes!! You are against mergers in the association space. I can tell you why: if one company dominates the space you’ll need to get a 8-5 job.

]]>