Comments on: Sorry, Guy, I Disagree…

By: Wes Trochlil

Wes Trochlil — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:29:46 +0000

Sue, clearly you ARE evil.

But I’d add that I think your approach makes a lot of sense. Checking everyone out and filtering down to those you really want to listen to. Seems reasonable enough to me.

By: Sue Pelletier

Sue Pelletier — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:17:56 +0000

I may be evil, but I pretty much follow everyone back who isn’t an obvious spammer, then use Tweetdeck to sort out those who I want to pay attention to from the rest. I still go through the big pile every now and then to see if there’s anyone to add to my “must read” list, but generally, most of those tweet just fly by unread. Is this wrong?

By: Wes Trochlil

Wes Trochlil — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:53:11 +0000

Elizabeth, next time I talk to Guy, I’ll be sure to let him know that you are inherently arrogant. :-)

By: Elizabeth Engel

Elizabeth Engel — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:29:01 +0000

Still finding my way on Twitter a bit, but from the beginning I’ve pretty much only followed people I know or know of (or who have an obvious handle that I know I’ll be interested in like @PhillySportsGuy). It might come off as snobby, but right now, I’m just working on how to manage the information stream, and I need to keep it at a stream rather than the Mighty Mississippi for a little bit.

By: Sally Strackbein

Sally Strackbein — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:16:55 +0000

I so agree with you. How can anyone follow 9,387 tweeters. I’d like to know that people following me are interested and I don’t expect people I follow to follow me back. Twitter etiquette will sort itself out over time and reason will prevail — or rational people will drop off out of boredom.

By: Wes Trochlil

Wes Trochlil — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:11:35 +0000

Scott and Dave, thanks for your thoughts. I don’t see how Twitter should be any different than any other medium; you pick and choose what is important to you, and you ignore the rest. Just because someone chose to listen to me hardly obliges me to listen to them. And of course, the reverse holds true.

By: Dave Gardner

Dave Gardner — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:05:13 +0000

Wes…at first, I’d heard that proper Twitter etiquette was following anyone who so requested. I’ve grown weary of that. So, I’m going to cull back my list while I look to find people who may be better aligned with my business objectives. I don’t care about a college kid who just got up, ate cereal and has homework to do. I’m trying to drive people to my blogs and websites. Frankly, I’m puzzled about how a lot of these people simply show up on my doorstep to “follow me.” When they show up, I look at their home page and ask “what’s in it for me?” In 10 seconds, I either decide they interest me or not. The vast majority don’t. I’m looking for business outcomes, not seeing how many people are following me. Am I a Twitter snob? Maybe. I don’t care. All the best…Dave

By: Scott Oser

Scott Oser — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:48:39 +0000

Wes,

I am so glad you posted this. I had been thinking about the etiquette of Twitter for a while now as I have seen my list of followers grow. The determination I have made is that I typically do follow new followers of mine for a while and see what they are tweeting about. If I find that the majority of their tweets have no value to me or they simply tweet all the time so I cannot keep up with it I then stop following them. Of course I have recently started being followed by some “tweet spammers” who I recognize off the bat and don’t follow them at all.

I am glad am I not the only one who no longer feels that they have to follow everyone following them because it is the “right” thing to do.

Thanks for standing your ground and voicing your opinion.

Scott