Measuring customer service
When I work with clients on AMS selection, one question that often comes up is: "How good is the software company's customer service?"
"Customer service" means different things to different people. For example, here are the customer service complaints I most commonly hear:
- "They won't let me talk to a human. All issues have to be submitted via their ticketing system and I have to wait weeks for a reply."
- "Every time I ask a question, they tell me they're going to bill me for the help."
- "The customer service staff I talk to don't understand how we use our system and are never able to help us."
For me, the true measure of customer service is how the software company responds when they have objectively made a mistake. In other words, it's not the mistake I judge, but how they respond to it. Case in point:
I was working with a client on an AMS implementation. In the course of discussions with the business analyst (BA) during the implementation, the BA stated that an online portal for single sign-on (SSO) was available for a $5,000 fee. Hearing this in the meeting, I was a bit stunned, because I had recalled from their RFP response that the SSO was included as baseline functionality (i.e., no additional fee).
I showed the RFP response to the BA, who said "Let me check with my manager." A little while later he told us: "The salesman made a mistake in his response, but we will honor it and not charge you the $5,000."
The mistake was clearly theirs. But their response is how I measured them. They could have easily said "Sorry, that was answered incorrectly, you still have to pay for this," but they chose the correct path of honoring their word.
It wasn't the mistake I judged them by, but how they responded to it when it was pointed out. That was good customer service.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Eyes wide open and affirmative decision-making
Eyes wide open and affirmative decision-making When I work with my clients on any type […]
Honoring an industry legend
Honoring an industry legend I’m taking a break from my usual data management tips to […]
Never burn a bridge
Never burn a bridge My children have reached the age where they have, or are, […]
You CAN compete with the big guys…
You CAN compete with the big guys… In my experience, associations often undersell their actual […]
Join (or start) your users group!
Join (or start) your users group! Today’s message is simple: If the AMS you’re using […]
They don’t care, until they care.
They don’t care, until they care. One of the more common questions I get from […]
Longfellow and data management
Longfellow and data management “We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing while […]
Do you really need all that historical data?
Do you really need all that historical data? A question I’ll often get from my […]
AI actually requires thinking
AI actually requires thinking “I don’t think AI introduces a new kind of thinking. It […]
It’s not the mistakes, but how you respond
It’s not the mistakes, but how you respond Recently a client was complaining about a bug that […]