Only one can be best
One of my (many) pet peeves with software vendor marketing is when an AMS company claims "We're the number one AMS product in the market" or "We're the top provider of membership software!" Since only ONE company can be "number one," by definition, all but one of these companies are lying.
And besides, "number one" as measured by what? What makes you "number one" or "the top"? According to whom?
Don't the people writing this marketing drivel know that it doesn't just fall on deaf ears, it actually makes them look silly (for making a claim that simply cannot be substantiated)?
What would be really impressive marketing copy would be things like the following:
- "98% of our customers are still using our software 10 years after first licensing it."
- "On average, our software saves our customers 40 hours of staff time per month."
- "Users of our software become better looking and more popular the longer they use it." (Just trying to see if you're paying attention.)
So if you're reading this marketing copy, ignore it. And if you're writing it, please stop!
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Eyes wide open and affirmative decision-making
Eyes wide open and affirmative decision-making When I work with my clients on any type […]
Honoring an industry legend
Honoring an industry legend I’m taking a break from my usual data management tips to […]
Never burn a bridge
Never burn a bridge My children have reached the age where they have, or are, […]
You CAN compete with the big guys…
You CAN compete with the big guys… In my experience, associations often undersell their actual […]
Join (or start) your users group!
Join (or start) your users group! Today’s message is simple: If the AMS you’re using […]
They don’t care, until they care.
They don’t care, until they care. One of the more common questions I get from […]
Longfellow and data management
Longfellow and data management “We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing while […]
Do you really need all that historical data?
Do you really need all that historical data? A question I’ll often get from my […]
AI actually requires thinking
AI actually requires thinking “I don’t think AI introduces a new kind of thinking. It […]
It’s not the mistakes, but how you respond
It’s not the mistakes, but how you respond Recently a client was complaining about a bug that […]