Pennywise and pound foolish
One definition of the phrase "pennywise and pound foolish" is to "describe something that is done to save a small amount of money now but that will cost a large amount of money in the future."
I think of this a lot when working with my clients, especially when they are making decisions about technology. (And if I'm being blunt, I see it most among those in the finance area.)
The "price to entry" for a lot of technology can be (perceived as) very high, especially if the organization has been spending little to no money on technology for a long time. I've had more than a few clients who, having not paid much of anything for technology for years, have sticker shock when they find out how much a modern AMS is going to cost them.
But often what they're not taking into account is the incredibly high indirect costs of spending so little on technology. For example, I once had a client tell me that she had staff actually resign from their jobs because, as the staffer put it "our poor technology makes it almost impossible to do my job."
So when you're investing in technology, you really need to think of it as an investment, not just an expense. The money you think you're saving now will likely have to be spent later, and quite possibly even more.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Eyes wide open and affirmative decision-making
Eyes wide open and affirmative decision-making When I work with my clients on any type […]
Honoring an industry legend
Honoring an industry legend I’m taking a break from my usual data management tips to […]
Never burn a bridge
Never burn a bridge My children have reached the age where they have, or are, […]
You CAN compete with the big guys…
You CAN compete with the big guys… In my experience, associations often undersell their actual […]
Join (or start) your users group!
Join (or start) your users group! Today’s message is simple: If the AMS you’re using […]
They don’t care, until they care.
They don’t care, until they care. One of the more common questions I get from […]
Longfellow and data management
Longfellow and data management “We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing while […]
Do you really need all that historical data?
Do you really need all that historical data? A question I’ll often get from my […]
AI actually requires thinking
AI actually requires thinking “I don’t think AI introduces a new kind of thinking. It […]
It’s not the mistakes, but how you respond
It’s not the mistakes, but how you respond Recently a client was complaining about a bug that […]